Tripp v. Vincent
This text of 5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 9 (Tripp v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this . case the chancellor decided that although the release of debt which is secured by a mortgage may discharge the of the mortgage upon the land, yet that where the debt is secured by a mortgage upon the land, as well as by the personal security of the mortgagor, the debt still exists as a valid claim against the land, although the creditor consents to discharge the personal liability of his debtor and to look to the land upon which the debt is a lien, for the payment thereof. That whether the debt itself was intended to be discharged, or the personal liability of the debtor only, is, in such cases, a question of fact arising from circumstances, or upon the construction of the instrument which is claimed to be a discharge of the debt.
Decree appealed from affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tripp-v-vincent-nychanct-1846.