Tripp v. Elliott
This text of 5 Blackf. 168 (Tripp v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Elliott and others sued Tripp in assumpsit before a justice of the peace, and were nonsuited. They [169]*169appealed to the Circuit Court, and obtained a judgment for twelve dollars together with costs. The defendant appealed to this Court; and the appeal has been dismissed this term for want of jurisdiction. Petition by the appellant for a rehearing.
We have no jurisdiction in any case which originated before a justice, unless the amount in controversy, in this Court, is at least twenty dollars exclusive of interest and costs. And though the amount so in controversy be more than twenty dollars, still if that amount inclusive of interest and costs be under fifty dollars, we have no jurisdiction unless a supersedeas be granted. Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 202.
The amount in controversy in this case, exclusive of interest and costs, is only twelve dollars; and the appeal was, therefore, correctly dismissed.
The petition is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Blackf. 168, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tripp-v-elliott-ind-1839.