Tripp v. Cochise, County of

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Sandra Tripp, No. CV-24-00604-TUC-JGZ (MSA)

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 County of Cochise, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 On July 24, 2025, Magistrate Judge Maria S. Aguilera issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) in which she recommended the Court dismiss this action 17 without prejudice. (Doc. 31.) The R&R notified Plaintiff Sandra Tripp she had fourteen 18 (14) days from the date of the R&R to file any objections. No objections have been filed. 19 If no party objects to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the District 20 Court is not required to review the magistrate judge’s decision under any specified standard 21 of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). However, the statute for review of a 22 magistrate judge’s recommendation “does not preclude further review by the district judge, 23 sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” Id. at 154. 24 The Court has reviewed Judge Aguilera’s R&R, Plaintiff’s filings, and the record. 25 The Court agrees with Judge Aguilera’s conclusion that this case should be dismissed 26 without prejudice. 27 // 28 // 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) is accepted and 3|| adopted in full. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court shall docket this Order and close 6 || its file in this action. 7 Dated this 11th day of August, 2025. 8

10 Jennifer G. Zipps 11 Chief United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-