Triplett v. Triplett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Triplett v. Triplett

245 S.E.2d 812, 37 N.C. App. 283, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2739

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 18, 1978

DocketNo. 7728DC690

StatusPublished

This text of 245 S.E.2d 812 (Triplett v. Triplett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Triplett v. Triplett, 245 S.E.2d 812, 37 N.C. App. 283, 1978 N.C. App. LEXIS 2739 (N.C. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant sets out 17 assignments of error in the record on appeal. In his brief, he has failed to state separately the questions presented, and has failed to refer to any of his assignments of error and exceptions, all in violation of App. R. 28(b)(3).

The transcript of the record on appeal was settled by agreement of the parties on 19 July 1977; it was certified by the Clerk of Superior Court on 17 August 1977. App. R. 11(e) requires that the record be certified within 10 days after it has been settled.

[284]*284The Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. See Burkhimer v. Coble, Comr. of Revenue, 35 N.C. App. 127, 239 S.E. 2d 852, cert. denied, 294 N.C. 441 (1978). For failure of defendant to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, this appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges CLARK and WEBB concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI