Triplett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Triplett v. State

624 S.W.2d 115, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3783

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 15, 1981

DocketNo. 43837

StatusPublished

This text of 624 S.W.2d 115 (Triplett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Triplett v. State, 624 S.W.2d 115, 1981 Mo. App. LEXIS 3783 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

REINHARD, Judge.

The state appeals from an order vacating the judgment and sentence entered on respondent’s plea of guilty to armed criminal action. We affirm.

Respondent was sentenced, pursuant to his pleas of guilty, to a nine year term for robbery in the first degree, and to a three year term for armed criminal action, the two terms to be served consecutively. Respondent filed a 27.26 motion attacking the sentence for armed criminal action.

Relying on Sours v. State, 603 S.W.2d 592 (Mo.banc 1981) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1131, 101 S.Ct. 953, 67 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981) the trial court vacated the judgment and sentence for armed criminal action. The state contends that we should reverse because our supreme court, in Sours v. State, 603 S.W.2d 592, ignored the mandate of the U. S. Supreme Court in Missouri v. Sours, 446 U.S. 962, 100 S.Ct. 2935, 64 L.Ed.2d 820 (1980).

The position of the Missouri Supreme Court is clear. See State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo.banc 1981). Hence we are required to affirm. See State v. Harris, 622 S.W.2d 330, (Mo.App.1981).

Judgment affirmed.

CRIST, P. J., and SNYDER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI