Triplett v. City of Mount Vernon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Triplett v. City of Mount Vernon

117 A.D.2d 596, 498 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52868

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.D.2d 596 (Triplett v. City of Mount Vernon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Triplett v. City of Mount Vernon, 117 A.D.2d 596, 498 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), dated April 1, 1985, as, upon granting renewal of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, adhered to the original determination denying the motion.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Our review of the record indicates that there is a triable issue of fact as to when certain repairs were allegedly done on the sidewalk upon which plaintiff Angelina Lillian Triplett purportedly fell. Accordingly, the denial of defendant’s motion for summary judgment was proper. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), dated April 1, 1985, as, upon granting renewal of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, adhered to the original determination denying the motion.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Our review of the record indicates that there is a triable issue of fact as to when certain repairs were allegedly done on the sidewalk upon which plaintiff Angelina Lillian Triplett purportedly fell. Accordingly, the denial of defendant’s motion for summary judgment was proper. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.2d 596, 498 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/triplett-v-city-of-mount-vernon-nyappdiv-1986.