Triple P.G. Sand Development, LLC v. Eduardo Del Pino

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 11, 2021
Docket01-21-00076-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Triple P.G. Sand Development, LLC v. Eduardo Del Pino (Triple P.G. Sand Development, LLC v. Eduardo Del Pino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Triple P.G. Sand Development, LLC v. Eduardo Del Pino, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Petition Granted and Order filed May 11, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00076-CV ——————————— TRIPLE P.G. SAND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ET AL., Appellants V. EDUARDO DEL PINO, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 281st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2020-08901

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR PERMISSIVE INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

Appellants filed an unopposed petition for permissive interlocutory appeal,1

seeking to challenge the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss pursuant to

Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a. To be entitled to a permissive interlocutory 1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d), (f); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. appeal from an interlocutory order that is not otherwise appealable, the petitioner

must establish that (1) the order appealed involves “a controlling question of law as

to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion, and (2) immediate

appeal from the order “may materially advance the ultimate termination of the

litigation.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d); TEX. R. APP. P.

28.3(e)(4).

The petition is granted. The notice of appeal is deemed to have been filed as

of the date of this order. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(k). This appeal is governed by the

rules for accelerated appeals. Id. The Clerk of this Court shall file a copy of this

order with the trial court clerk. Id. The motion for expedited ruling on the

unopposed petition for permissive interlocutory appeal is dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Landau and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 51.014
Texas CP § 51.014(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Triple P.G. Sand Development, LLC v. Eduardo Del Pino, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/triple-pg-sand-development-llc-v-eduardo-del-pino-texapp-2021.