Tripi v. Cocca

229 A.D. 343, 242 N.Y.S. 177, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10379
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 30, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 229 A.D. 343 (Tripi v. Cocca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tripi v. Cocca, 229 A.D. 343, 242 N.Y.S. 177, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action is by a vendee, first, to amend a written contract of purchase and sale of real estate by inserting a law date; and second, to recover from the vendor a down-payment and incidental expenses, and, if necessary, to have a lien declared [344]*344and a sale as in foreclosure to enforce such lien. The plaintiff has recovered in full.

The transaction involved so much in the way of mutual postponement and efforts made on both sides to clear the title of appaient incumbrances that — in the absence of a law day in the contract — defendants were entitled to a reasonable time for fulfillment. (Trainor Co. v. Amsinck & Co., Inc., 236 N. Y. 392; Murray Co. v. Lidgerwood Mfg. Co., 241 id. 455.) The fixing by the learned trial court of October 26, 1928, as the law day was unwarranted by the evidence. The difficulties in the way of passing a good title to plaintiff, as manifested by the record, are not so serious in fact or law that plaintiff at this time should have the relief awarded. (Brokaw v. Duffy, 165 N. Y. 391; Harris v. Shorall, 230 id. 343; 231 id. 541; Norwegian Evangelical Free Church v. Milhauser, 252 id. 186.)

The judgment should be reversed, without costs of this appeal, and an interlocutory judgment of this court entered appointing a referee to take proof of title and to report to this court, with his opinion, such proof to be taken within thirty days after entry of the judgment of this court and service thereof and of notice of entry.

Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Upon the coming, in of the referee’s report additional findings of fact and conclusions of law will be made, suitable as a basis for the final judgment to be entered.

All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Thompson, JJ.

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, and an interlocutory judgment of this court entered appointing a referee to take proof of title, and to report to this court, with his opinion, such proof to be taken within thirty days after service of the judgment entered upon this decision with notice of entry. Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Upon the coming in of the referee’s report additional findings of fact and conclusions of law will be made, suitable as a basis for the final judgment to be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tripi v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
237 A.D. 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Tripi v. Cocca
232 A.D. 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D. 343, 242 N.Y.S. 177, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tripi-v-cocca-nyappdiv-1930.