Trio Packaging Corp. v. Avne Systems, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Trio Packaging Corp. v. Avne Systems, Ltd.

303 A.D.2d 578, 756 N.Y.S.2d 764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 578 (Trio Packaging Corp. v. Avne Systems, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trio Packaging Corp. v. Avne Systems, Ltd., 303 A.D.2d 578, 756 N.Y.S.2d 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated May 1, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate its default in answering the complaint. Justice Crane has been substituted for the late Justice O’Brien (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A determination vacating a default “rests in the sound discretion of the court and will be upheld in the absence of an improvident exercise of that discretion” (Braddy v 601 Crown St. Corp., 282 AD2d 638, 639 [2001]). In the instant case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to vacate its default. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for goods sold and delivered, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated May 1, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate its default in answering the complaint. Justice Crane has been substituted for the late Justice O’Brien (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A determination vacating a default “rests in the sound discretion of the court and will be upheld in the absence of an improvident exercise of that discretion” (Braddy v 601 Crown St. Corp., 282 AD2d 638, 639 [2001]). In the instant case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to vacate its default. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 578, 756 N.Y.S.2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trio-packaging-corp-v-avne-systems-ltd-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack