TRINOVA Corp. v. Pilkington Bros., P.L.C.

640 N.E.2d 1144, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1202, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2582

Opinion

Defendants-appellants, Libbey-Owens-Ford Company and Pilkington Holdings, Inc., have filed with this court a motion to reconsider our September 14, 1994 decision (reported at 70 Ohio St.3d 271, 638 N.E.2d 572) in the above-captioned matter.

After consideration of appellants’ motion, we will treat it as a motion for clarification and grant same to the extent that the first sentence of the third full paragraph appearing at page 277, 638 N.E.2d at 576, should read as follows:

“We are likewise unpersuaded by the argument that LOF was a third-party beneficiary of the contract executed by TRINOVA and Pilkington.”

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. A.W. Sweeney and Wright, JJ., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.