Trinkle v. Donnelly
120 A. 928, 98 N.J.L. 908, 13 Gummere 908, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 312
This text of 120 A. 928 (Trinkle v. Donnelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Trinkle v. Donnelly, 120 A. 928, 98 N.J.L. 908, 13 Gummere 908, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 312 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Sayayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, 'Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
120 A. 928, 98 N.J.L. 908, 13 Gummere 908, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trinkle-v-donnelly-nj-1923.