Trinkle v. Donnelly

120 A. 928, 98 N.J.L. 908, 13 Gummere 908, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 312
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Trinkle v. Donnelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 N.J.L. 298
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 20, 1923·Published

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Sayayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, 'Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trinkle v. Donnelly, 120 A. 928, 98 N.J.L. 908, 13 Gummere 908, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 312 (N.J. 1923).

120 A. 928 (Trinkle v. Donnelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.