Trinkaus v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 224 A.D.2d 988 (Trinkaus v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in failing to dismiss plaintiffs’ first and second causes of action for defamation. An action to recover damages for libel and slander must be commenced within one year (CPLR 215 [3]; Karam v First Am. Bank, 190 AD2d 1017, 1018). The record establishes that the alleged defamatory statements were made some time [989]*989in the fall of 1990, shortly after plaintiffs’ termination from employment on September 17, 1990. The note of issue filed by plaintiffs establishes that the instant action was commenced on January 14, 1992. Because the action was commenced more than one year after the allegedly defamatory statements were made, it is time-barred (see, CPLR 215 [3]; Seymour v New York State Elec. & Gas, 215 AD2d 971).
Therefore, we modify the order on appeal by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ first and second causes of action. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J. — Dismiss Causes of Action.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.D.2d 988, 637 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trinkaus-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1996.