Trinity Universal Insurace v. Lambert
This text of 179 So. 2d 15 (Trinity Universal Insurace v. Lambert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
is of the opinion that a writ should be granted, especially as to the plea of division. A waiver of division was not alleged in the petition, nor was a solidary judgment prayed for. See dissents from denial of a rehearing in Court of Appeal. [The dissents in the Court of Appeal were as follows: LANDRY and BAILES, JJ., dissent from refusal to grant rehearing to Paul A. Lambert on question of validity of the Judgment against Lambert in solido and on basis of Lambert’s plea of division.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 So. 2d 15, 248 La. 413, 1965 La. LEXIS 2202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trinity-universal-insurace-v-lambert-la-1965.