Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. Burke

142 S.W. 658
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 6, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 142 S.W. 658 (Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. Burke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. Burke, 142 S.W. 658 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

RAINEY, C. J.

This is a suit against the railway company to recover damages for the alleged negligent burning of grass caused by the emission of sparks from the engine of said company.

It is a companion to the case of Trinity & Brazos Valley Railway Company v. B. E. Greg *659 ory, 142 S. W. 656, this day reversed and remanded by this court. The facts adduced, the issues raised, and the assignments of error are practically the same. The opinion in the Gregory Case is equally applicable to this, and the same is adopted in the disposition of this case.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. Gregory
142 S.W. 656 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.W. 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trinity-b-v-ry-co-v-burke-texapp-1912.