Trinidad & Tobago United Cultural Ass'n v. Vista Travel Service, Inc.

53 Misc. 2d 1015, 280 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1592
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 20, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 Misc. 2d 1015 (Trinidad & Tobago United Cultural Ass'n v. Vista Travel Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trinidad & Tobago United Cultural Ass'n v. Vista Travel Service, Inc., 53 Misc. 2d 1015, 280 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The oral contract relied upon by plaintiff is inconsistent with the provisions of the carrier’s tariff schedule filed pursuant to the provisions of section 403 of the Federal Aviation Act (U. S. Code, tit. 49‘, § 1373) and is invalid and unenforcihle (New York & Honduras Rosario Mining Co. v. Riddle Airlines, 3 A D 2d 457 [1st Dept., 1957], affd. 4 N Y 2d 755). Estoppel cannot be invoked against a common carrier to [1016]*1016avoid a tariff provision (United States v. Associated Air Transport, 275 F. 2d 827, 832-833).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

Concur — Gold, J. P., Hecht, Jr., and Hofstadter, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valentine v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
365 A.2d 475 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Crosby & Co. v. Compagnie Nationale Air France
76 Misc. 2d 990 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 Misc. 2d 1015, 280 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trinidad-tobago-united-cultural-assn-v-vista-travel-service-inc-nyappterm-1967.