Trinidad & Tobago United Cultural Ass'n v. Vista Travel Service, Inc.

53 Misc. 2d 1015, 280 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1592
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 20, 1967·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The oral contract relied upon by plaintiff is inconsistent with the provisions of the carrier’s tariff schedule filed pursuant to the provisions of section 403 of the Federal Aviation Act (U. S. Code, tit. 49‘, § 1373) and is invalid and unenforcihle (New York & Honduras Rosario Mining Co. v. Riddle Airlines, 3 A D 2d 457 [1st Dept., 1957], affd. 4 N Y 2d 755). Estoppel cannot be invoked against a common carrier to [1016] avoid a tariff provision (United States v. Associated Air Transport, 275 F. 2d 827, 832-833).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

Concur — Gold, J. P., Hecht, Jr., and Hofstadter, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trinidad & Tobago United Cultural Ass'n v. Vista Travel Service, Inc., 53 Misc. 2d 1015, 280 N.Y.S.2d 337, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

53 Misc. 2d 1015 (Trinidad & Tobago United Cultural Ass'n v. Vista Travel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valentine v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
365 A.2d 475 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Crosby & Co. v. Compagnie Nationale Air France
76 Misc. 2d 990 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)