Trinh, L. v. Trinh, K.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 21, 2020·No. 75 EM 2020·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

LAN TU TRINH, : No. 75 EM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : KATHLEEN LIEN TRINH AND LT : INTERNATIONAL BEAUTY SCHOOL, INC., : : Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2020, the “Petitioner’s Motion to File Pro

Se” is DISMISSED. This Court’s Prothonotary was mistaken when it instructed Petitioner

to submit such a filing. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to process the previously

submitted pro se filing in the normal course, including issuing any defect-correction notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trinh, L. v. Trinh, K., (Pa. 2020).

Trinh, L. v. Trinh, K. (Trinh, L. v. Trinh, K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.