Trinh, L. v. Trinh, K.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
LAN TU TRINH, : No. 75 EM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : KATHLEEN LIEN TRINH AND LT : INTERNATIONAL BEAUTY SCHOOL, INC., : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2020, the “Petitioner’s Motion to File Pro
Se” is DISMISSED. This Court’s Prothonotary was mistaken when it instructed Petitioner
to submit such a filing. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to process the previously
submitted pro se filing in the normal course, including issuing any defect-correction notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trinh, L. v. Trinh, K. (Trinh, L. v. Trinh, K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.