Trina Solar (Changzhou) Sci. & Tech. Co. v. United States
Opinion
Slip Op. 24-
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
TRINA SOLAR (CHANGZHOU) SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES, Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge
Defendant, Court No. 23-00219 and
AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR SOLAR MANUFACTURING,
Defendant-Intervenor.
JUDGMENT
This matter is before the court following the filing of the results of the first remand order.
See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 29 (Feb. 22, 2024) (“Remand Results”); see also Trina Solar (Changzhou) Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 23-174, 2023 WL 8600801 (CIT Dec. 12, 2023) (“Remand Order”). The court remanded to the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) after Commerce requested remand in order to allow it to either reconsider or further explain its ocean freight calculation in this case. See Defendant’s Affirmative Motion for Remand, ECF No. 23 (Dec. 11, 2023); see also Remand Order.
In the Remand Results, Commerce changed the way it calculated ocean freight, and no party now objects to the new calculation. See Remand Results at 5; see also Defendant’s Notice Regarding Comments to Remand Results, ECF No. 31 (Mar. 14, 2024). The Remand Results comply with the court’s order. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Remand Results by the United States Department of Commerce are SUSTAINED.
__/s/ Jane A. Restani__
Jane A. Restani, Judge
Dated: March 21, 2024 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2024 CIT 36 (Trina Solar (Changzhou) Sci. & Tech. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.