Trina Annette Marshall v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 17, 2008
Docket13-07-00459-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Trina Annette Marshall v. State (Trina Annette Marshall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trina Annette Marshall v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-00459-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________



TRINA ANNETTE MARSHALL, Appellant,



v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.



On appeal from the 36th District Court
of San Patricio County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Trina Annette Marshall, attempts to appeal her convictions for possession of cocaine and money laundering. The trial court has certified that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On August 16, 2007, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On December 14, 2007, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel's response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b)

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 17th day of January, 2008.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Trina Annette Marshall v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trina-annette-marshall-v-state-texapp-2008.