Trimming v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Trimming v. State

253 So. 2d 720

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 1971

DocketNo. 71-592

StatusPublished

This text of 253 So. 2d 720 (Trimming v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trimming v. State, 253 So. 2d 720 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury and adjudicated guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, to wit: Grand Larceny. On this appeal it is urged that the trial court erred in allowing a rebuttal witness to testify over appellant’s objection. The rebuttal witness was properly called to rebut by prior, inconsistent statements the testimony of the appellant given in his own behalf. Barkley v. State, 152 Fla. 147, 10 So.2d 922 (1942).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury and adjudicated guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, to wit: Grand Larceny. On this appeal it is urged that the trial court erred in allowing a rebuttal witness to testify over appellant’s objection. The rebuttal witness was properly called to rebut by prior, inconsistent statements the testimony of the appellant given in his own behalf. Barkley v. State, 152 Fla. 147, 10 So.2d 922 (1942).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 So. 2d 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trimming-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack