Trimmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

905 A.2d 913
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 3, 2006·No. Appeal No. 58 MAL 2006·Published

Opinion

[914] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. Additionally, as this Court finds that the Commonwealth Court substituted its determination of the facts of this matter and the credibility of the witnesses for the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s proper assessments, the judgment of the Commonwealth Court is reversed, and the determination of the Workers’ Compensation Judge as affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board is reinstated. See Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Skirpan), 531 Pa. 287, 612 A.2d 434 (1992) (holding that determination of facts and credibility are solely within the province of the Workers’ Compensation Judge).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trimmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 905 A.2d 913 (Pa. 2006).

905 A.2d 913 (Trimmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
612 A.2d 434 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)