Trimble v. More

15 Jones & S. 340
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 2, 1881·Published

Opinion

By the Court.—Sedgwick, Ch. J.

The case of Crompton v. Conkling (15 Nat. Bankr. Reg. 417), requires us to hold that, in a case like the present, the individual discharged in a proceeding begun, carried on, and ended by him solely, is not relieved, by force of his discharge, from the partnership debts.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs, disbursements to be taxed by the clerk.

Truax, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trimble v. More, 15 Jones & S. 340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

15 Jones & S. 340 (Trimble v. More) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crompton v. Conkling
6 F. Cas. 850 (S.D. New York, 1877)