Trimble v. More

15 Jones & S. 340
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMay 2, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 15 Jones & S. 340 (Trimble v. More) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trimble v. More, 15 Jones & S. 340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

By the Court.—Sedgwick, Ch. J.

The case of Crompton v. Conkling (15 Nat. Bankr. Reg. 417), requires us to hold that, in a case like the present, the individual discharged in a proceeding begun, carried on, and ended by him solely, is not relieved, by force of his discharge, from the partnership debts.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs, disbursements to be taxed by the clerk.

Truax, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crompton v. Conkling
6 F. Cas. 850 (S.D. New York, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Jones & S. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trimble-v-more-nysuperctnyc-1881.