Trimble v. Danahar

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Trimble v. Danahar

108 N.Y.S. 657

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 108 N.Y.S. 657 (Trimble v. Danahar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trimble v. Danahar, 108 N.Y.S. 657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued to recover $116.67, which he deposited with the defendant under a- lease which provided that this sum should be applied to the payment of the rent of the last month of the term, but that “the same to be forfeited upon failure to comply with any of the within covenants.” The plaintiff was dispossessed, and the defendant leased the premises for the balance of the term at a loss to him of $16.66. Upon the facts proved the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the sum of $100.01, and judgment for the defendant was improperly entered.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued to recover $116.67, which he deposited with the defendant under a- lease which provided that this sum should be applied to the payment of the rent of the last month of the term, but that “the same to be forfeited upon failure to comply with any of the within covenants.” The plaintiff was dispossessed, and the defendant leased the premises for the balance of the term at a loss to him of $16.66. Upon the facts proved the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the sum of $100.01, and judgment for the defendant was improperly entered.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 N.Y.S. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trimble-v-danahar-nyappterm-1908.