Trim v. Planters' Cotton Oil Co.

163 S.W. 103, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 172
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 S.W. 103 (Trim v. Planters' Cotton Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trim v. Planters' Cotton Oil Co., 163 S.W. 103, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 172 (Tex. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

WILLSON, C. J.

It appears from the record that the judgment appealed from was rendered during the term of a district court of Fannin county which ended April 5, 1913, and that the appeal bond was not filed in that court until April 26, 1913; that is, not until after the expiration of 20 days from the date said term of court ended. It is settled that the requirement of the statute (article 2084, R. S. 1911) that an appeal bond shall be filed within 20 days after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was rendered must be complied with; otherwise the appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal. Burr v. Lewis, 6 Tex. 80; Ry. Co. v. Whatley, 99 Tex. 128, 87 S. W. 819; Nash v. Noble, 52 Tex. Civ. App. 425, 114 S. W. 848; Simpson v. Baker, 57 Tex. Civ. App. 460, 122 S. W. 959. The appeal therefore must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bolton v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
166 S.W. 1194 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 S.W. 103, 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trim-v-planters-cotton-oil-co-texapp-1914.