Trilla v. Smith

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Trilla v. Smith

7 P.R. 14

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided May 16, 1904·No. No. 109·Published

Opinion

Me. Justice MacLeaby,

after making the above statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The finding’s of fact and conclusions of law of the judgment appealed from are accepted, and in view of the legal provisions cited therein, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with costs against the appellant. The record is ordered to be returned to the Mayagüez court, together with the proper certificate.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernandez, Fi-gneras and Sulzbacher concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Justice MacLeaby,

after making the above statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The finding’s of fact and conclusions of law of the judgment appealed from are accepted, and in view of the legal provisions cited therein, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment appealed from, with costs against the appellant. The record is ordered to be returned to the Mayagüez court, together with the proper certificate.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernandez, Fi-gneras and Sulzbacher concurred.

Trilla v. Smith, 7 P.R. 14 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

7 P.R. 14 (Trilla v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.