Triggs v. Chrones

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

KETHON LAVERON TRIGGS, No. 08-15151

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-00-04201-CW Northern District of California, v. Oakland

LEE ANN CHRONES, Acting Warden, ORDER Respondent - Appellee,

and

A. A. LAMARQUE,

Respondent.

Before: THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, * District Judge.

The memorandum disposition filed on September 15, 2009 is AMENDED as

follows:

On Page 7, delete the sentence reading: “Because the California Court of

Appeal addressed the merits of this claim, we review under the deferential AEDPA

standard.” Replace the deleted sentence with the following sentence: “In

reviewing these claims, we need not decide whether Triggs properly presented

* The Honorable David Ezra, United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. them to the California Court of Appeal because, whether we apply AEDPA’s

deferential standard of review or review de novo, we reach the same result.”

With this amendment, Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. No

further petitions shall be entertained.

-2-