Trifecta Services Company v. Najar
This text of Trifecta Services Company v. Najar (Trifecta Services Company v. Najar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-1933 _____________________________
TRIFECTA SERVICES COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
EDERLIN NAJAR,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. Walter J. Havers, Judge.
Date of Accident: March 12, 2021.
September 4, 2024
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Owens v. CCJ, Auto Transport, 59 So. 3d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (finding coverage under the Florida Workers’ Compensation Law, section 440.09(1)(d), Florida Statutes, with respect to an out-of-state work injury because the claimant’s employment contract was formed while the claimant was residing in Florida, and the claimant’s acceptance of the Employer’s offer in Florida was the last act necessary to form the contract).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and BILBREY and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Todd J. Sanders and Lori L. Bethea of Chartwell Law, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Richard Sicking and Mark A. Touby of Touby, Chait & Sicking, P.L., Coral Gables, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trifecta Services Company v. Najar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trifecta-services-company-v-najar-fladistctapp-2024.