Trieger v. City of New York
This text of 17 Misc. 2d 103 (Trieger v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence adduced at the trial is insufficient to warrant a finding that the mere presence- of loose gravel on the roadway undergoing repairs constitutes such a danger so as to impose liability for negligence on those under a duty to repair. Nor has plaintiff established any causal relationship between the condition on the roadway and the damages alleged to have been sustained.
The judgment should be reversed, judgment directed in favor of the defendant dismissing the claim of plaintiff, and dismissing* the claimover in favor of third-party plaintiff against the impleaded third-party defendant, all without costs.
Concur — Hbcht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Misc. 2d 103, 183 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trieger-v-city-of-new-york-nyappterm-1959.