Tricolo v. Centalanza

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Tricolo v. Centalanza

129 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 570, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 283

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 18, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of this case has led up to the conclusion that a right result was reached in the court below upon the facts, and, therefore, the judgment under review herein should be affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Our examination of this case has led up to the conclusion that a right result was reached in the court below upon the facts, and, therefore, the judgment under review herein should be affirmed.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Tricolo v. Centalanza, 129 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 570, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1925).

Pincite

129 A. 923 (Tricolo v. Centalanza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related