Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Trickey v. State

Trickey v. State

375 So. 2d 363, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 1979
DocketNo. NN-334
StatusPublished

This text of 375 So. 2d 363 (Trickey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trickey v. State, 375 So. 2d 363, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions, but remand for resentencing to provide appellant an opportunity to study and make known to the sentencing court any errors which may appear in the presentence investigation report. The report was disclosed only a few minutes before the sentencing hearing and the trial court erred in failing to defer sentencing upon defense counsel’s request. See Guglielmo v. State, 318 So.2d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.713. Remanded for resentencing.

McCORD, Acting C. J., SHIVERS, J., and MASON, ERNEST E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guglielmo v. State
318 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
375 So. 2d 363, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trickey-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.