Tricia Baron v. Richard J. Grant

897 N.E.2d 1077, 11 N.Y.3d 825, 868 N.Y.S.2d 593, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 3372
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 28, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 897 N.E.2d 1077 (Tricia Baron v. Richard J. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tricia Baron v. Richard J. Grant, 897 N.E.2d 1077, 11 N.Y.3d 825, 868 N.Y.S.2d 593, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 3372 (N.Y. 2008).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that movant has failed to show that the order sought to be appealed from is final as required by Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (3).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SALLY ANN BLAZYNSKI v. A. Gareleck & Sons, Inc.
897 N.E.2d 1077 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
897 N.E.2d 1077, 11 N.Y.3d 825, 868 N.Y.S.2d 593, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 3372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tricia-baron-v-richard-j-grant-ny-2008.