Trice v. State

784 S.W.2d 239, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1783, 1989 WL 150277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Trice v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1059
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 12, 1989·No. No. 56305·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Demetrius Trice, pled guilty to second degree murder and first degree robbery and was sentenced to two concurrent twenty year prison terms. He appeals the denial of his rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing claiming ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s alleged failure to investigate three alibi witnesses. We have reviewed this allegation, the entirety of the record on which it is based, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. We do not find the court’s findings and conclusions to be clearly erroneous. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989). We also find that an extended opinion would have no precedential value and, therefore, we affirm the motion court’s denial pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trice v. State, 784 S.W.2d 239, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1783, 1989 WL 150277 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

784 S.W.2d 239 (Trice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Day v. State
770 S.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)