Trice v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Trice v. State

28 S.E.2d 586, 70 Ga. App. 472, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 3

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 5, 1944

Docket30302.

StatusPublished

This text of 28 S.E.2d 586 (Trice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trice v. State, 28 S.E.2d 586, 70 Ga. App. 472, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 3 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of shooting at another. The evidence for the State authorized the verdict. The accused introduced no evidence, and failed to make a statement to the jury. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial which contained the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of shooting at another. The evidence for the State authorized the verdict. The accused introduced no evidence, and failed to make a statement to the jury. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial which contained the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 S.E.2d 586, 70 Ga. App. 472, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trice-v-state-gactapp-1944.