Trice v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Trice v. State

28 S.E.2d 586, 70 Ga. App. 472, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 3

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 5, 1944·No. 30302.·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of shooting at another. The evidence for the State authorized the verdict. The accused introduced no evidence, and failed to make a statement to the jury. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial which contained the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of shooting at another. The evidence for the State authorized the verdict. The accused introduced no evidence, and failed to make a statement to the jury. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial which contained the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Trice v. State, 28 S.E.2d 586, 70 Ga. App. 472, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 3 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

28 S.E.2d 586 (Trice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.