Trice v. Segura

673 F. App'x 352
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2017
DocketNo. 16-7545
StatusPublished

This text of 673 F. App'x 352 (Trice v. Segura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trice v. Segura, 673 F. App'x 352 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Wayne Trice appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C, § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with its prior order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review a district court’s 'dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Trice v. Segura, No. 1:16-cv-00724-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballard v. Carlson
882 F.2d 93 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 F. App'x 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trice-v-segura-ca4-2017.