Trice v. Segura

673 F. App'x 352
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2017·No. No. 16-7545·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Wayne Trice appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C, § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with its prior order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review a district court’s 'dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse of discretion. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Trice v. Segura, No. 1:16-cv-00724-GBL-MSN (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trice v. Segura, 673 F. App'x 352 (4th Cir. 2017).

673 F. App'x 352 (Trice v. Segura) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballard v. Carlson
882 F.2d 93 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)