Trice v. Reilly
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7944
RAPHAEL S. TRICE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., Chairman; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00078-REP)
Submitted: June 27, 2007 Decided: July 19, 2007
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raphael S. Trice, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Raphael S. Trice, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Trice v. Reilly, No. 3:06-cv-00078-REP (E.D.
Va. Nov. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Trice v. Reilly (Trice v. Reilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.