Trice v. Liberty Insurance Corporation
This text of Trice v. Liberty Insurance Corporation (Trice v. Liberty Insurance Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 GERALDINE TRICE, 7 Case No.: 2:20-cv-02139-KJD-NJK Plaintiff(s), 8 Order v. 9 [Docket No. 20] LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE 10 COMPANY, 11 Defendant(s).
12 13 Pending before the Court is a proposed discovery plan filed by Defendant. Docket No. 20. 14 Parties are required to hold a conference early in a case to discuss a variety of issues, including the 15 formulation of a proposed discovery plan. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Even in instances in which parties 16 do not agree on the contents of a proposed discovery plan, they must still file a joint discovery 17 plan that provides their positions as to how the case should proceed. E.g., Local Rule 26-1(a).1 A 18 meet-and-confer not having taken place and the pending proposed discovery plan having not been 19 filed jointly, Defendant’s proposed discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff must 20 promptly contact defense counsel to conduct the Rule 26(f) conference and the parties must file a 21 joint proposed discovery plan by February 22, 2021. 22 23 24 1 Defendant has not to date sought a stay of discovery pending resolution of its motion to 25 dismiss. On the other hand, Plaintiff has filed a motion to stay that remains pending. To be clear, the mere filing and pendency of a motion to stay does not automatically result in the imposition of 26 a stay. E.g., Apple Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 2011 WL 334669, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011) (quoting Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Comp. Inc., 707 F. Supp. 1429, 1441 (D. 27 Del. 1989)). To the extent that one or both parties believe that discovery deadlines should not be set at this time given arguments they have with respect to requesting a stay, they may express such 28 positions within the joint proposed discovery plan. 1 Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: January 22, 2021 Zz Nancy J. Koppe 5 United States-Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trice v. Liberty Insurance Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trice-v-liberty-insurance-corporation-nvd-2021.