Tricamo v. PEI Muscles, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tricamo v. PEI Muscles, LLC

389 S.W.3d 732, 2013 WL 69264, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 18

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2013·No. No. ED 98442·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sandra Tricamo (“Claimant”) appeals from the judgment of the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying her unemployment benefits. The Commission adopted the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security, which found that Claimant was an independent contractor. We affirm the Commission’s decision.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sandra Tricamo (“Claimant”) appeals from the judgment of the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying her unemployment benefits. The Commission adopted the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security, which found that Claimant was an independent contractor. We affirm the Commission’s decision.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Tricamo v. PEI Muscles, LLC, 389 S.W.3d 732, 2013 WL 69264, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 18 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

389 S.W.3d 732 (Tricamo v. PEI Muscles, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.