Tribune Entertainment Corp. v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tribune Entertainment Corp. v. New York State Division of Human Rights

210 A.D.2d 11, 619 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11872, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 174

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 11 (Tribune Entertainment Corp. v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tribune Entertainment Corp. v. New York State Division of Human Rights, 210 A.D.2d 11, 619 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11872, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered November 17, 1993, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent Division’s dismissal of respondent complainant’s complaint of race and disability discrimination on the [12]*12ground of administrative convenience, unanimously affirmed, without ccsts.

Dismissal of the complaint on the ground of administrative convenience prior to public hearing and formal fact finding was not arbitrary and capricious since the complainant will be proceeding in Federal court on identical claims (Executive Law § 297 [3] [c]; Eastman Chem. Prods. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 162 AD2d 157). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered November 17, 1993, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent Division’s dismissal of respondent complainant’s complaint of race and disability discrimination on the [12]*12ground of administrative convenience, unanimously affirmed, without ccsts.

Dismissal of the complaint on the ground of administrative convenience prior to public hearing and formal fact finding was not arbitrary and capricious since the complainant will be proceeding in Federal court on identical claims (Executive Law § 297 [3] [c]; Eastman Chem. Prods. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 162 AD2d 157). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 11, 619 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11872, 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tribune-entertainment-corp-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack