Tribune Co. v. McCarthy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Tribune Co. v. McCarthy

201 Ill. App. 586, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 792

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 30, 1916

DocketGen. No. 22,248

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 Ill. App. 586 (Tribune Co. v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tribune Co. v. McCarthy, 201 Ill. App. 586, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 792 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion oi the court.

2. Trial, § 204*—when verdict for plaintiff should be directed. Where a defense is affirmative and defendants fail to maintain it, the court should instruct the jury to find for plaintiff. 3. Costs, § 73*—when cost of additional abstract properly charged against appellant. Where the imperfections in an abstract filed by an appellant render it necessary for appellee to file an additional abstract, the expense of such additional abstract will be taxed as costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion oi the court.

2. Trial, § 204*—when verdict for plaintiff should be directed. Where a defense is affirmative and defendants fail to maintain it, the court should instruct the jury to find for plaintiff. 3. Costs, § 73*—when cost of additional abstract properly charged against appellant. Where the imperfections in an abstract filed by an appellant render it necessary for appellee to file an additional abstract, the expense of such additional abstract will be taxed as costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 Ill. App. 586, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tribune-co-v-mccarthy-illappct-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack