Triboro Coach Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.

59 A.D.2d 891, 398 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14078

This text of 59 A.D.2d 891 (Triboro Coach Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Triboro Coach Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co., 59 A.D.2d 891, 398 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In an action on an insurance policy, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 3, 1977, which denied its motion for an order of preclusion. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Although a straightforward and concise response to defendant-appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars would have saved the parties from the trouble of engaging in this picayune appeal, the response to the demand adequately provided the information requested. Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Damiani and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.2d 891, 398 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/triboro-coach-corp-v-american-home-assurance-co-nyappdiv-1977.