Triangle Mint Corp. v. Mulrooney

232 A.D. 783
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. While the use of the machine, with the cotter pin inserted, may be innocent enough, save for the possibility of a storekeeper’s exchanging the tokens or slugs for merchandise or cash, of which there is no proof here, the extraction of the cotter pin makes the machine a slot machine in violation of sections 970-a and 982 of the Penal Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Triangle Mint Corp. v. Mulrooney, 232 A.D. 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

232 A.D. 783 (Triangle Mint Corp. v. Mulrooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Betti
34 A.2d 91 (U.S. District Court, 1943)
People v. Kay
102 P.2d 1110 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Mills Novelty Co. v. Bolan
3 F. Supp. 968 (E.D. New York, 1933)
Young v. Sunderman
238 A.D. 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)