Triad Commercial Captive Co. v. Comerica Bank (In re GTI Capital Holdings, LLC)
This text of 409 F. App'x 68 (Triad Commercial Captive Co. v. Comerica Bank (In re GTI Capital Holdings, LLC)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellants appeal the bankruptcy court’s approval of a settlement between Appellees David Reaves, the bankruptcy trustee, and Comerica Bank. However, Appellants’ brief does not identify any error in any of the bankruptcy court’s rulings.
Rather, Appellants appear to be seeking on appeal an advisory opinion about the [69]*69effects of the settlement agreement on other litigation. We lack jurisdiction to render advisory opinions. See Kittel v. Thomas, 620 F.3d 949, 951 (9th Cir.2010).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 F. App'x 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/triad-commercial-captive-co-v-comerica-bank-in-re-gti-capital-holdings-ca9-2010.