Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. McMickle
This text of 236 S.E.2d 82 (Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. McMickle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit involves a lease for a sign along Interstate 75 in Locust Grove, Georgia. Plaintiff Tri-State sued defendant, McMickle, for actual damages for breach of the lease, for specific performance of the lease, and for punitive damages. McMickle counterclaimed for damages, punitive damages and attorney fees. The jury’s verdict in favor of McMickle for $600 was made the judgment of the trial court and Tri-State appeals. We affirm.
The trial court did not err in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of Tri-State. Questions of fact existed, which the jury resolved in favor of McMickle and the verdict is supported by the evidence. Nor can we say that the trial court erred in admitting evidence and charging the jury on attorney fees. Tri-State has not been harmed since the jury’s award was for general damages and no attorney fees were granted. The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 S.E.2d 82, 239 Ga. 155, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tri-state-systems-inc-v-mcmickle-ga-1977.