Tri State Surveying, Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Anderson, Frank & MacK, LLC)
This text of Tri State Surveying, Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Anderson, Frank & MacK, LLC) (Tri State Surveying, Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Anderson, Frank & MacK, LLC)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(2004); see Moore u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 96 Nev. 415, 417, 610 P.2d 188, 189 (1980) (determining that mandamus is not an appropriate remedy when resolution of the writ petition would not dispose of the entire controversy). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
, CA. Hardesty
"c29104., J. Parraguirre
Douglas
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Fahrendorf, Viloria, Oliphant & Oster, LLP Zupancic Rothbone Law Group P.C. Law Offices of Jerry Carter, PC Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 19474 e
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tri State Surveying, Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Anderson, Frank & MacK, LLC), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tri-state-surveying-ltd-v-dist-ct-anderson-frank-mack-llc-nev-2015.