Tri State Surveying, Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Anderson, Frank & MacK, LLC)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 13, 2015·No. 69020·Unpublished

Opinion

(2004); see Moore u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 96 Nev. 415, 417, 610 P.2d 188, 189 (1980) (determining that mandamus is not an appropriate remedy when resolution of the writ petition would not dispose of the entire controversy). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, CA. Hardesty

"c29104., J. Parraguirre

Douglas

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Fahrendorf, Viloria, Oliphant & Oster, LLP Zupancic Rothbone Law Group P.C. Law Offices of Jerry Carter, PC Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 19474 e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tri State Surveying, Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Anderson, Frank & MacK, LLC), (Neb. 2015).

Tri State Surveying, Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Anderson, Frank & MacK, LLC) (Tri State Surveying, Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Anderson, Frank & MacK, LLC)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related