Tri State Distributing Co. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 416, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 894
United States Customs Court·Decided November 9, 1954·No. No. 58495; petition 6968-R (Milwaukee)·Published

Opinion

[417]*417Opinion by

Ford, J.

At tbe trial, the vice president of the petitioner testified that, in making entry of the merchandise involved, he used the invoice price of the factory in Switzerland and that he supplied the customs officials with the invoices and all other information which he had at that time with reference to the value of the-watches. Following Syndicate Trading Co. v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 409, T. D. 41339) and Crebstein v. United States (15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 285, T. D. 42470), it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tri State Distributing Co. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 416, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 894 (cusc 1954).

33 Cust. Ct. 416 (Tri State Distributing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Syndicate Trading Co. v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 409 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)
Grebstein v. United States
15 Ct. Cust. 285 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1927)