Tri-Land Properties, Inc. v. 115 West 28th Street Corp.

247 A.D.2d 233, 668 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 894
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 5, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered July 17, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants-appellants’ motion to renew a prior order granting plaintiff summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the motion court that the motion was not based on any material facts of which defendants were unaware at the time the prior motion was made, and that no excuse for having omitted these facts is offered to support renewal (see, Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568; Matter of Banow v Simins, 53 AD2d 542, mot to dismiss appeal granted 40 NY2d 989, cert denied sub nom. Liebowitz v Simins, 430 US 968).

Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tri-Land Properties, Inc. v. 115 West 28th Street Corp., 247 A.D.2d 233, 668 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 233 (Tri-Land Properties, Inc. v. 115 West 28th Street Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinberg v. Kinberg
50 A.D.3d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)