Tri-County Electric Cooperative v. Snow

120 S.E.2d 14, 238 S.C. 298, 1961 S.C. LEXIS 91
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 11, 1961
Docket17780
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 S.E.2d 14 (Tri-County Electric Cooperative v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tri-County Electric Cooperative v. Snow, 120 S.E.2d 14, 238 S.C. 298, 1961 S.C. LEXIS 91 (S.C. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The TrPCounty Electric Cooperative, Inc., a nonprofit membership corporation formed. under the Rural Electric Cooperative Act, Sections 12-1001 to 12-1083, inclusive, of the 1952 Code, petitioned the South Carolina Public Service Commission for an order requiring the City of Orangeburg to' cease and desist from extending its electrical utility operations into an area outside of the city limits which the Cooperative claimed was already occupied and served by it. The City of Orangeburg timely objected to the jurisdiction of the Commission upon the grounds (1) that the Commission was without power to regulate or restrict its electrical utility operations, and (2) that under the Electrical Utilities Act, Sections 24-1 to 24-176, inclusive, of the 1952 Code, the Cooperative had no standing to ask for a cease and desist order. Both grounds were sustained by the Commission and the proceeding dismissed. Thereafter the Cooperative brought this action in the Court of Common Pleas for Rich-land-County to set aside the order'of the Commission. The Circuit Judge affirmed the Commission’s order upon both jurisdictional grounds. The 'Cooperative has appealed.

*301 AVe find it unnecessary to determine whether the Commission is empowered to restrict or regulate the electrical utility operations of municipalities outside of their corporate limits. In Black River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Service Commission, S. C., 120 S. E. (2d) 6, we held that an electric cooperative had no standing to seek a cease and desist order under the Electrical Utilities Act. Upon this ground, the order of the Circuit Judge is affirmed and the proceedings dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Orangeburg v. Moss
204 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 S.E.2d 14, 238 S.C. 298, 1961 S.C. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tri-county-electric-cooperative-v-snow-sc-1961.