Trezevant v. State

84 S.W. 828, 47 Tex. Crim. 502, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 11, 1905·No. No. 3083.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HENDEBSObT, Judge.

Appellant was convicted under article 599, Penal Code, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $5; hence this appeal. There is no bill of exceptions nor statement of facts in the record. The only question presented is, does the information sufficiently charge an offense. It alleges that appellant “did then and there unlawfully, in the presence and hearing of B. E. Daughertjq curse and swear, and abuse said Daugherty in a manner reasonably calculated to provoke a breach of the peace.” The language of the statute is, “under circumstances reasonably calculated,” etc., instead of “in a manner”. The contention is that “in a manner” is not equivalent to the statutory requirement. While we do not believe it' is equivalent, that is, the terms are not exactly synonymous, still, “in a manner calculated to provoke a breach of the peace,” is tantamount to the allegation of “under circumstances,” and in our opinion is the statement or allegation of the circumstance which the State would be required to prove, and could prove no other circumstance than the one in which the abusive language was used; that is, the State would be confined to that allegation. In our opinion the information is sufficient. There being no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trezevant v. State, 84 S.W. 828, 47 Tex. Crim. 502, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 12 (Tex. 1905).

84 S.W. 828 (Trezevant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State
159 S.W. 1183 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)