Trey Stinnett and Cassi Stinnett McDermott v. Windfern Development Corporation and Blue Water Construction Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 29, 2011
Docket13-11-00240-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Trey Stinnett and Cassi Stinnett McDermott v. Windfern Development Corporation and Blue Water Construction Company (Trey Stinnett and Cassi Stinnett McDermott v. Windfern Development Corporation and Blue Water Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Trey Stinnett and Cassi Stinnett McDermott v. Windfern Development Corporation and Blue Water Construction Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00240-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

TREY STINNETT AND CASSI STINNETT MCDERMOTT, APPELLANTS,

v.

WINDFERN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND BLUE WATER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPELLEES. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Trey Stinnett and Cassi Stinnett McDermott, perfected an appeal from

a judgment entered by the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas, in cause

number 44,610. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss on grounds that all matters in controversy between them in this cause have been fully compromised and

settled. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In

accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 29th day of December, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Trey Stinnett and Cassi Stinnett McDermott v. Windfern Development Corporation and Blue Water Construction Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trey-stinnett-and-cassi-stinnett-mcdermott-v-windf-texapp-2011.