Trevor Wood v. State
This text of Trevor Wood v. State (Trevor Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-01-0341-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
FEBRUARY 20, 2002
______________________________
TREVOR ROSS WOOD, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY;
NO. 2494; HONORABLE HUGH REED, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
Pursuant to a plea of guilty, appellant Trevor Ross Wood was convicted of driving
while intoxicated and sentenced to 30 days confinement in the Armstrong County Jail,
suspended for one year, and a $500 fine. By a sole point of error, appellant contends the
* Tex. R. App. P. 47.1. trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because there was no probable
cause to stop appellant. For the reasons expressed herein, we reverse and render.
Relying on Vicknair v. State, 751 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Cr.App. 1986), appellant
contends his motion to suppress should have been granted because his arrest and
subsequent conviction resulted from an unlawful stop for a cracked taillight. With
commendable professional candor, the State agrees with appellant that his motion to
suppress should have been granted. Appellant’s point of error is sustained.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and a judgment of acquittal
is hereby rendered.
Don H. Reavis Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trevor Wood v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trevor-wood-v-state-texapp-2002.