Trevon Marquez Deunte Neal v. the State of Texas
This text of Trevon Marquez Deunte Neal v. the State of Texas (Trevon Marquez Deunte Neal v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-23-00241-CR
TREVON MARQUEZ DEUNTE NEAL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 5th District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 22F1240-005
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rambin MEMORANDUM OPINION
Trevon Marquez Deunte Neal pled guilty to evading arrest or detention and, pursuant to a
plea agreement, the trial court sentenced Neal to twenty months’ confinement. Despite the trial
court’s certification that this was a plea-bargain case and that Neal had no right of appeal, Neal
timely filed a notice of appeal. Because we find that we are without jurisdiction over this cause
due to Neal’s plea bargain with the State, we will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea-bargain cases.
Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure details that right as follows:
(2) . . . In a plea[-]bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only:
(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,
(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or
(C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). There is no indication in the record before this Court (1) that this
specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute, (2) that Neal filed a motion that was ruled on
before trial, or (3) that Neal obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. To the contrary, the
trial court’s certification of Neal’s right of appeal indicates that he has no right of appeal.
Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court is required to
dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s certification indicates that there is no right of
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
2 On November 30, 2023, we informed Neal of the apparent defect in our jurisdiction over
his appeal and afforded him an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect. Neal
did not file a response to our November 30 correspondence.
Because Neal has no right of appeal due to his plea bargain with the State and because
the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that he is without a right of appeal, we dismiss
this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Jeff Rambin Justice
Date Submitted: January 18, 2024 Date Decided: January 19, 2024
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Trevon Marquez Deunte Neal v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trevon-marquez-deunte-neal-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.